And I almost never read rules, I just maintain a good attitude, and clean posts.
(BTW, I just wanted to quote a cool sounding line of shakespear.
Alas, how sharper than a serpants tooth is a lack of obediance to the clearly posted rules?)
That’s not a good policy to take. Many forums have random rules you wouldn’t expect, or different restrictions on image sizes, or different levels of censorship…
Warning for not readin the rules is stupid. If there is anything I hated about SCU, a big part of it was the rule system. That “Mills” guy would force you to read through several pages of rules filled with stupid and uneeded analogies, then force you to find the “OMG PASSWORD” hidden randomly throughout all of it. Although you should read the rules, warning for not reading them is stupid. People should only be warned when they break a rule (Not reading the rules is a stupid rule).
“[not reading the rules at a new forum] is not a good policy to take. Many forums have random rules you wouldn’t expect, or different restrictions on image sizes, or different levels of censorship…”
Uh…okay…I think I picked up a little late, but Wonder, if you actually decide to read this, it really is a good idea to read the rules…other than that, I hope we didn’t scare him off that badly…
Anyways, Daz is right. Not reading the rules is just a very bad policy or habit. It just a good idea. Otherwise, you would have people joining and posting random crap that just takes up memory and bandwidth.